<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1926 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302245</link>
    <description>The HC found that the tribunal had decided the matter on facts by following an earlier tribunal ruling based on the Supreme Court decision in Ballarpur Industries. It held that no infirmity existed in the tribunal&#039;s order and that no substantial or ordinary question of law arose for consideration. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 20:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1926 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302245</link>
      <description>The HC found that the tribunal had decided the matter on facts by following an earlier tribunal ruling based on the Supreme Court decision in Ballarpur Industries. It held that no infirmity existed in the tribunal&#039;s order and that no substantial or ordinary question of law arose for consideration. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>