https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302243 For prosecution of a director under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint must at least contain the basic averment that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business under Section 141(1). Where liability is sought under Section 141(2), the complaint must additionally allege consent, connivance, or neglect with some particulars. Applying that standard, complaints alleging day-to-day control and supervision were treated as sufficient to sustain cognizance, and disputed questions about the director's exact role could not be resolved in Section 482 CrPC proceedings without unimpeachable material. Complaints lacking even the basic statutory averment were held liable to be quashed. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 May 2022 20:41:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302243 For prosecution of a director under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint must at least contain the basic averment that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business under Section 141(1). Where liability is sought under Section 141(2), the complaint must additionally allege consent, connivance, or neglect with some particulars. Applying that standard, complaints alleging day-to-day control and supervision were treated as sufficient to sustain cognizance, and disputed questions about the director's exact role could not be resolved in Section 482 CrPC proceedings without unimpeachable material. Complaints lacking even the basic statutory averment were held liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302243