<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1302 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302248</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 was examined in light of the main noticee&#039;s discharge under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme and issuance of Form-4. On that basis, the text states that the foundation for sustaining penalty against the appellant no longer survived, and the penalty was waived with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 20:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1302 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302248</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 was examined in light of the main noticee&#039;s discharge under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme and issuance of Form-4. On that basis, the text states that the foundation for sustaining penalty against the appellant no longer survived, and the penalty was waived with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>