<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (6) TMI 40 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28880</link>
    <description>The court quashed the ITO&#039;s order refusing registration of the firm under Section 185(5) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that refusal of registration should not automatically follow an ex parte assessment. The court directed the ITO to reconsider the registration issue, urging the exercise of judicial discretion based on relevant materials. The petitioner&#039;s plea was partially allowed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:07:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (6) TMI 40 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28880</link>
      <description>The court quashed the ITO&#039;s order refusing registration of the firm under Section 185(5) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that refusal of registration should not automatically follow an ex parte assessment. The court directed the ITO to reconsider the registration issue, urging the exercise of judicial discretion based on relevant materials. The petitioner&#039;s plea was partially allowed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>