<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Advance Ruling Application Dismissed: Contract Expired Before Filing; Service Extension Questions Deemed Irrelevant by AAR.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63380</link>
    <description>Maintainability of application - in any case the definition of advance ruling does not permit making of an application in relation to the supply of services already undertaken for a long period of two years in pursuance of an agreement which had expired long before the making of the application seeking advance ruling - the questions involving claim of extension of the two years contract agreement for supply of service for further period of one and a half years, creation of such an extension document at a stage far later than the date of filing application seeking advance ruling and non-existence of evidence showing submission of such an extension letter to the AAR lose their relevance - AAAR</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 13:24:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 13:24:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Advance Ruling Application Dismissed: Contract Expired Before Filing; Service Extension Questions Deemed Irrelevant by AAR.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63380</link>
      <description>Maintainability of application - in any case the definition of advance ruling does not permit making of an application in relation to the supply of services already undertaken for a long period of two years in pursuance of an agreement which had expired long before the making of the application seeking advance ruling - the questions involving claim of extension of the two years contract agreement for supply of service for further period of one and a half years, creation of such an extension document at a stage far later than the date of filing application seeking advance ruling and non-existence of evidence showing submission of such an extension letter to the AAR lose their relevance - AAAR</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 13:24:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>