https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302235 A tenant shown in the revenue record as tenant-at-will under the vendor before and at the time of sale was held to have a preferential right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, and the decree in his favour was sustained. The lower appellate court was also entitled to admit additional documentary evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC because the record was needed to remove uncertainty noticed by the trial court, and its reception did not amount to filling a lacuna. The objection based on the vendor's status as a female and the restricted class of pre-emptors under Section 15(2) was not entertained in second appeal because it had not been raised below and would have required fresh factual inquiry. en-us Fri, 28 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 May 2022 11:53:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302235 A tenant shown in the revenue record as tenant-at-will under the vendor before and at the time of sale was held to have a preferential right of pre-emption under Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, and the decree in his favour was sustained. The lower appellate court was also entitled to admit additional documentary evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC because the record was needed to remove uncertainty noticed by the trial court, and its reception did not amount to filling a lacuna. The objection based on the vendor's status as a female and the restricted class of pre-emptors under Section 15(2) was not entertained in second appeal because it had not been raised below and would have required fresh factual inquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302235