<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422196</link>
    <description>A refund claim for market research services was examined on whether the services qualified as export of services under Section 2(6)(iii) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including whether the provider functioned as an intermediary. The Delhi HC did not decide the merits at this stage and issued notice in the writ petition, directing the filing of a counter-affidavit and rejoinder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422196</link>
      <description>A refund claim for market research services was examined on whether the services qualified as export of services under Section 2(6)(iii) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including whether the provider functioned as an intermediary. The Delhi HC did not decide the merits at this stage and issued notice in the writ petition, directing the filing of a counter-affidavit and rejoinder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>