<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422189</link>
    <description>The court set aside the ex-parte order under the Income Tax Act due to a technical glitch preventing the petitioner from submitting a response, deeming it a violation of natural justice. The respondent was directed to re-file its reply and issue a fresh assessment order within six weeks, ensuring compliance with the law and upholding due process. The writ petition and related applications were disposed of with these directions, emphasizing fairness in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422189</link>
      <description>The court set aside the ex-parte order under the Income Tax Act due to a technical glitch preventing the petitioner from submitting a response, deeming it a violation of natural justice. The respondent was directed to re-file its reply and issue a fresh assessment order within six weeks, ensuring compliance with the law and upholding due process. The writ petition and related applications were disposed of with these directions, emphasizing fairness in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>