<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessment order against the petitioner for income tax due on the seized amount. Additionally, the court upheld the interest u/s 220(2) demanded by the ITO, stating that the order of a judicial authority is provisionally executable until finality through appeal, making the petitioner liable for the interest accrued during the appeal process. The challenge against the orders was dismissed, and the petitioner&#039;s plea was unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:41:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessment order against the petitioner for income tax due on the seized amount. Additionally, the court upheld the interest u/s 220(2) demanded by the ITO, stating that the order of a judicial authority is provisionally executable until finality through appeal, making the petitioner liable for the interest accrued during the appeal process. The challenge against the orders was dismissed, and the petitioner&#039;s plea was unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>