<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28873</link>
    <description>A leasehold interest continued after expiry of the lease and uninterrupted possession by the lessee can amount to a tenancy by holding over, creating a fresh month-to-month tenancy under the Transfer of Property Act. Such an interest is juridical, transferable and heritable, and therefore falls within the wide meaning of &quot;assets&quot; and &quot;belonging to&quot; the assessee for wealth-tax purposes under section 2(e)(v). Valuation of the properties on a rental basis was also upheld, because the Tribunal could rely on location, income-yielding capacity and other relevant facts, and the commercial property&#039;s rental capitalisation on a multiple of ten disclosed no legal error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28873</link>
      <description>A leasehold interest continued after expiry of the lease and uninterrupted possession by the lessee can amount to a tenancy by holding over, creating a fresh month-to-month tenancy under the Transfer of Property Act. Such an interest is juridical, transferable and heritable, and therefore falls within the wide meaning of &quot;assets&quot; and &quot;belonging to&quot; the assessee for wealth-tax purposes under section 2(e)(v). Valuation of the properties on a rental basis was also upheld, because the Tribunal could rely on location, income-yielding capacity and other relevant facts, and the commercial property&#039;s rental capitalisation on a multiple of ten disclosed no legal error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>