<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 435 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject the Section 9 application due to genuine pre-existing disputes between the parties and the improper clubbing of claims from different work orders. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further investigation into the disputes, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 08:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 435 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject the Section 9 application due to genuine pre-existing disputes between the parties and the improper clubbing of claims from different work orders. The Tribunal emphasized the need for further investigation into the disputes, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>