https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422168 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming a service tax demand of Rs. 49,64,062 against a security services provider for evasion. The appellant's failure to produce evidence of payment led to the confirmation of the demand, disallowance of Cenvat credit, and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal justified the disallowance of Cenvat credit due to insufficient documentation and upheld the penalties for evasion of duty and non-deposit of service tax amounts. The appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence supporting the appellant's arguments and the legality of the confirmed tax demand and penalties. en-us Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 May 2022 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422168 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming a service tax demand of Rs. 49,64,062 against a security services provider for evasion. The appellant's failure to produce evidence of payment led to the confirmation of the demand, disallowance of Cenvat credit, and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal justified the disallowance of Cenvat credit due to insufficient documentation and upheld the penalties for evasion of duty and non-deposit of service tax amounts. The appeal was dismissed based on the lack of evidence supporting the appellant's arguments and the legality of the confirmed tax demand and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422168