https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302223 Subsequent FIRs based on the same search and seizure operations, the same accused, and the same broad allegations of conversion of unaccounted currency were treated as part of one composite transaction and not as independent proceedings. Applying the settled rule against a second FIR for the same cognizable offence or connected offences arising from the same occurrence, the Court held that the later FIRs were impermissible as against the petitioners. It also found the allegations too vague to disclose a prima facie case, since they did not specify any public servant, bank, account, time, or concrete transaction showing the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, conspiracy, or corruption. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 May 2022 08:32:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302223 Subsequent FIRs based on the same search and seizure operations, the same accused, and the same broad allegations of conversion of unaccounted currency were treated as part of one composite transaction and not as independent proceedings. Applying the settled rule against a second FIR for the same cognizable offence or connected offences arising from the same occurrence, the Court held that the later FIRs were impermissible as against the petitioners. It also found the allegations too vague to disclose a prima facie case, since they did not specify any public servant, bank, account, time, or concrete transaction showing the essential ingredients of cheating, criminal breach of trust, conspiracy, or corruption. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302223