<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1592 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302218</link>
    <description>The appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, successfully appealed against the denial of CENVAT credit on outward transportation service availed before 01/04/2008. The Tribunal held that there was no restriction on claiming CENVAT credit for &#039;outward transportation service&#039; at the time of service receipt. Therefore, the appellant rightfully availed the credit in November 2009. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 08:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1592 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302218</link>
      <description>The appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, successfully appealed against the denial of CENVAT credit on outward transportation service availed before 01/04/2008. The Tribunal held that there was no restriction on claiming CENVAT credit for &#039;outward transportation service&#039; at the time of service receipt. Therefore, the appellant rightfully availed the credit in November 2009. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>