https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302225 Section 36 of the Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 empowered the Coordination Committee to amend Statute No. 28 on its own motion, and consultation with the Executive Council was required only when the draft originated from that body. On that basis, the resolution dated 07.01.2004 enhancing the superannuation age was treated as a valid statutory exercise and not a mere recommendation. The Court further recognised that, after amendment of the College Code to maintain parity, teachers in aided private colleges could not be denied the same retirement age as government teachers. Teachers in aided private educational institutions were therefore entitled to continue until 65 years and receive salary for that period. en-us Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 May 2022 08:32:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302225 Section 36 of the Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 empowered the Coordination Committee to amend Statute No. 28 on its own motion, and consultation with the Executive Council was required only when the draft originated from that body. On that basis, the resolution dated 07.01.2004 enhancing the superannuation age was treated as a valid statutory exercise and not a mere recommendation. The Court further recognised that, after amendment of the College Code to maintain parity, teachers in aided private colleges could not be denied the same retirement age as government teachers. Teachers in aided private educational institutions were therefore entitled to continue until 65 years and receive salary for that period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302225