<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 16 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28865</link>
    <description>The court upheld the orders of the Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner, dismissing the petition challenging the cancellation of the auction sale. It was determined that there were no grounds to invoke the court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The judgment emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and fairness in auction proceedings conducted by government authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 16 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28865</link>
      <description>The court upheld the orders of the Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner, dismissing the petition challenging the cancellation of the auction sale. It was determined that there were no grounds to invoke the court&#039;s extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The judgment emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and fairness in auction proceedings conducted by government authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>