<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422139</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging a Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Tribunal held that it lacks jurisdiction over PMLA matters, following the Principle of Stare Decisis and previous judgments. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to uphold the attachment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422139</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging a Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Tribunal held that it lacks jurisdiction over PMLA matters, following the Principle of Stare Decisis and previous judgments. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to uphold the attachment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>