<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 397 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422137</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC declared Entry 3(if) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and corresponding State Tax notification ultra-vires the GST Acts and Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court held that the mandatory 1/3rd deduction for land value in construction contracts was arbitrary and contrary to statutory valuation provisions requiring actual price consideration. The deeming fiction lacked nexus with the charge of tax on construction services and violated equality principles. The Court found the notification discriminatory as it applied uniform deduction regardless of transaction nature or actual land value ascertainability, when detailed statutory valuation mechanisms already existed under GST Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 397 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422137</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC declared Entry 3(if) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and corresponding State Tax notification ultra-vires the GST Acts and Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court held that the mandatory 1/3rd deduction for land value in construction contracts was arbitrary and contrary to statutory valuation provisions requiring actual price consideration. The deeming fiction lacked nexus with the charge of tax on construction services and violated equality principles. The Court found the notification discriminatory as it applied uniform deduction regardless of transaction nature or actual land value ascertainability, when detailed statutory valuation mechanisms already existed under GST Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>