<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 392 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422132</link>
    <description>Delay in post-merger compliance may be condoned where the applicant shows bona fide efforts, correspondence with revenue authorities on stamp duty formalities, and disruption caused by the Covid-19 period. The Tribunal accepted that the default was not wilful and that the stated circumstances were beyond the applicant&#039;s control, so the 451-day delay was condoned and time for compliance was extended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 08:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 392 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422132</link>
      <description>Delay in post-merger compliance may be condoned where the applicant shows bona fide efforts, correspondence with revenue authorities on stamp duty formalities, and disruption caused by the Covid-19 period. The Tribunal accepted that the default was not wilful and that the stated circumstances were beyond the applicant&#039;s control, so the 451-day delay was condoned and time for compliance was extended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>