<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1232 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions in the case favored the assessee on various legal questions raised by the revenue. The Tribunal was justified in allowing claims for enhanced plant &amp;amp; machinery costs, certain expenses as business expenditures, foreign travel expenses, interest amounts, and other deductions under the Income Tax Act. The revenue did not challenge these decisions due to precedents and previous acceptance. The appeal was concluded with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 17:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1232 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions in the case favored the assessee on various legal questions raised by the revenue. The Tribunal was justified in allowing claims for enhanced plant &amp;amp; machinery costs, certain expenses as business expenditures, foreign travel expenses, interest amounts, and other deductions under the Income Tax Act. The revenue did not challenge these decisions due to precedents and previous acceptance. The appeal was concluded with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>