<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 593 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302184</link>
    <description>Where an order has not been stayed, a contempt petition must be disposed of on merits so the court can examine whether there has been deliberate violation of a subsisting order and preserve the order&#039;s enforceability. The pending appeal should not be heard before that contempt petition is decided. Directions were issued to dispose of the contempt petition within three months and to defer hearing of the appeal until then.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 13:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 593 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302184</link>
      <description>Where an order has not been stayed, a contempt petition must be disposed of on merits so the court can examine whether there has been deliberate violation of a subsisting order and preserve the order&#039;s enforceability. The pending appeal should not be heard before that contempt petition is decided. Directions were issued to dispose of the contempt petition within three months and to defer hearing of the appeal until then.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>