<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1441 - COMPANY LAW BOARD PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302180</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board dismissed the application for a review of the final order, stating that the findings and relief granted were not influenced by the fabricated document. The Board clarified its power to review orders based on fraud or misrepresentation, emphasizing that in this case, the main allegations and decisions were not reliant on the disputed document.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 13:02:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1441 - COMPANY LAW BOARD PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302180</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board dismissed the application for a review of the final order, stating that the findings and relief granted were not influenced by the fabricated document. The Board clarified its power to review orders based on fraud or misrepresentation, emphasizing that in this case, the main allegations and decisions were not reliant on the disputed document.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>