https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302178 The Delhi HC held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC can be used to quash an FIR, proceedings and summoning order where the FIR or complaint, taken at face value, does not prima facie disclose the alleged offence against the accused. Here, the foundational allegations did not constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC against the petitioners, and a later supplementary statement could not supply missing criminal allegations. On that basis, the FIR, the proceedings arising from it, and the summoning order qua the petitioners were liable to be quashed. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2022 12:00:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302178 The Delhi HC held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC can be used to quash an FIR, proceedings and summoning order where the FIR or complaint, taken at face value, does not prima facie disclose the alleged offence against the accused. Here, the foundational allegations did not constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC against the petitioners, and a later supplementary statement could not supply missing criminal allegations. On that basis, the FIR, the proceedings arising from it, and the summoning order qua the petitioners were liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302178