<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 681 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302175</link>
    <description>A charge of criminal conspiracy requires material showing an agreement or nexus between the accused and the other participants; mere association, relationship, or the opening of bank accounts in the petitioner&#039;s name was insufficient without bedrock facts showing participation in the unlawful design. The record disclosed no clear link establishing knowledge, agreement, or active role in the alleged siphoning of funds, and the allegations were too slender to create grave suspicion for trial on conspiracy or the connected substantive offences. The charges framed against the petitioner were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 681 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302175</link>
      <description>A charge of criminal conspiracy requires material showing an agreement or nexus between the accused and the other participants; mere association, relationship, or the opening of bank accounts in the petitioner&#039;s name was insufficient without bedrock facts showing participation in the unlawful design. The record disclosed no clear link establishing knowledge, agreement, or active role in the alleged siphoning of funds, and the allegations were too slender to create grave suspicion for trial on conspiracy or the connected substantive offences. The charges framed against the petitioner were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>