<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 375 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422115</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objection, the reassessment order for the Assessment Year 2013-14, and the demand notice issued under Section 156. The court allowed the writ petition with a cost of Rs. 5000/- to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee within three weeks, failing which the amount would be recovered as a fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 375 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422115</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objection, the reassessment order for the Assessment Year 2013-14, and the demand notice issued under Section 156. The court allowed the writ petition with a cost of Rs. 5000/- to be deposited with the High Court Legal Services Committee within three weeks, failing which the amount would be recovered as a fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>