<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 372 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422112</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no penalty was warranted under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the voluntary surrender of income, payment of taxes, and lack of concealment during assessment negated the need for a penalty. The decision was based on the absence of a show cause notice regarding the disputed long term capital gain, supported by legal precedents, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 08:40:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 372 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422112</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no penalty was warranted under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the voluntary surrender of income, payment of taxes, and lack of concealment during assessment negated the need for a penalty. The decision was based on the absence of a show cause notice regarding the disputed long term capital gain, supported by legal precedents, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>