<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decisions of the lower authorities, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 56(2)(viib) and Section 68 of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, following the prescribed valuation method. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the additions totaling Rs. 86,25,000 were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 08:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decisions of the lower authorities, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 56(2)(viib) and Section 68 of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, following the prescribed valuation method. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the additions totaling Rs. 86,25,000 were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>