<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 362 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422102</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessee, confirming the orders of the CIT(A) and the AO. The disallowance of agricultural income as unexplained cash credit and the addition of cash and jewellery as unexplained income were upheld. The tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims and explanations regarding the agricultural income and the assets found during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 362 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422102</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals by the assessee, confirming the orders of the CIT(A) and the AO. The disallowance of agricultural income as unexplained cash credit and the addition of cash and jewellery as unexplained income were upheld. The tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims and explanations regarding the agricultural income and the assets found during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>