https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28846 The High Court of Gujarat upheld the validity of an alienation made by a Hindu undivided family's sole surviving coparcener, despite his wife's entitlement to maintenance. The court ruled that the coparcener could dispose of coparcenary property as separate property, including making sales, mortgages, or gifts, based on established legal principles. The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that the existence of a female member entitled to maintenance does not restrict the coparcener's right to alienate the property. The court also limited the challenge to the alienation to specific grounds raised before the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Revenue. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28846 The High Court of Gujarat upheld the validity of an alienation made by a Hindu undivided family's sole surviving coparcener, despite his wife's entitlement to maintenance. The court ruled that the coparcener could dispose of coparcenary property as separate property, including making sales, mortgages, or gifts, based on established legal principles. The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that the existence of a female member entitled to maintenance does not restrict the coparcener's right to alienate the property. The court also limited the challenge to the alienation to specific grounds raised before the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the Revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 11 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28846