<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422075</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of excess remuneration to partners. The tribunal found the remuneration was within the authorized limit as per the partnership deed and IT Act. The appeal was deemed maintainable based on audit objections despite the tax effect being below the prescribed limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 06:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 335 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422075</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of excess remuneration to partners. The tribunal found the remuneration was within the authorized limit as per the partnership deed and IT Act. The appeal was deemed maintainable based on audit objections despite the tax effect being below the prescribed limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>