<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 332 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming that the amount paid to creditors cannot be considered as the cost of shares for determining capital gain. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the decision that the fair market value as of 01-04-1981 cannot be adopted for indexation purposes. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and agreed with the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 06:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 332 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming that the amount paid to creditors cannot be considered as the cost of shares for determining capital gain. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the decision that the fair market value as of 01-04-1981 cannot be adopted for indexation purposes. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee&#039;s arguments and agreed with the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>