<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422067</link>
    <description>A later revised penalty order replaces the earlier order under the doctrine of merger, so the earlier order does not survive independently. A procedural defect arising from the absence of prior approval in the revised order was treated as curable, and the matter was remanded for compliance and fresh consideration. Penalty computation was confined to the additions finally sustained in quantum proceedings, and the quantum determination was binding on the lower authorities for that purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 06:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 327 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422067</link>
      <description>A later revised penalty order replaces the earlier order under the doctrine of merger, so the earlier order does not survive independently. A procedural defect arising from the absence of prior approval in the revised order was treated as curable, and the matter was remanded for compliance and fresh consideration. Penalty computation was confined to the additions finally sustained in quantum proceedings, and the quantum determination was binding on the lower authorities for that purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>