<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422047</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellant to treat assessment orders as show cause notices, submit objections, and provide a personal hearing before redoing the assessment. The Court emphasized procedural fairness and refrained from coercive action until completion of the assessment. The appellant paid 15% of disputed tax and submitted objections but faced financial distress due to bank account attachment without fresh assessment orders. The Court remitted the matter for reconsideration, setting conditions for lifting the attachment. The final judgment reduced the payment amount required to lift the attachment, balancing justice with the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422047</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellant to treat assessment orders as show cause notices, submit objections, and provide a personal hearing before redoing the assessment. The Court emphasized procedural fairness and refrained from coercive action until completion of the assessment. The appellant paid 15% of disputed tax and submitted objections but faced financial distress due to bank account attachment without fresh assessment orders. The Court remitted the matter for reconsideration, setting conditions for lifting the attachment. The final judgment reduced the payment amount required to lift the attachment, balancing justice with the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>