https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422045 The appellate court upheld the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the trial court, dismissing the appeal. It found that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof and provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim of payment. The court noted that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted by the accused, leading to the affirmation of the trial court's decision. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 May 2022 06:36:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422045 The appellate court upheld the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the trial court, dismissing the appeal. It found that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof and provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim of payment. The court noted that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted by the accused, leading to the affirmation of the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422045