https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422043 In prosecutions for cheque dishonour involving a company, basic averments that directors and the cheque-signing accused were in charge of and responsible for the company's business were sufficient at the threshold under Section 141(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, so quashing was declined. As to the other accused, allegations of active involvement, exchange of messages, and written communications were enough to disclose a prima facie role under Section 141(2), indicating consent, connivance, or neglect and requiring trial rather than a detailed enquiry in quashing proceedings. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 May 2022 06:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422043 In prosecutions for cheque dishonour involving a company, basic averments that directors and the cheque-signing accused were in charge of and responsible for the company's business were sufficient at the threshold under Section 141(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, so quashing was declined. As to the other accused, allegations of active involvement, exchange of messages, and written communications were enough to disclose a prima facie role under Section 141(2), indicating consent, connivance, or neglect and requiring trial rather than a detailed enquiry in quashing proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422043