<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 301 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422041</link>
    <description>The court set aside the reassessment notices issued under the Income Tax Act for multiple assessment years due to incorrect entity name and violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing the petitioner to provide specific documents for cross-verification and ensuring a fair hearing process. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles and legal procedures in the reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2022 06:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 301 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422041</link>
      <description>The court set aside the reassessment notices issued under the Income Tax Act for multiple assessment years due to incorrect entity name and violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing the petitioner to provide specific documents for cross-verification and ensuring a fair hearing process. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles and legal procedures in the reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>