<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1801 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302148</link>
    <description>Assessment under the TNVAT Act, 2006 for 2015-16 was challenged on the grounds of disputed service of revision notices and levy of entry tax on a paver finisher machine. The Court noted the absence of postal acknowledgment for the dispatched notices and referred to precedent that equipment not qualifying as a motor vehicle may fall outside entry tax liability. The assessment was therefore required to be reconsidered after giving the dealer an opportunity to file objections, produce supporting material, and be heard personally. The existing assessment was to be treated as a show cause notice, and coercive action was restrained until reassessment was completed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 20:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1801 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302148</link>
      <description>Assessment under the TNVAT Act, 2006 for 2015-16 was challenged on the grounds of disputed service of revision notices and levy of entry tax on a paver finisher machine. The Court noted the absence of postal acknowledgment for the dispatched notices and referred to precedent that equipment not qualifying as a motor vehicle may fall outside entry tax liability. The assessment was therefore required to be reconsidered after giving the dealer an opportunity to file objections, produce supporting material, and be heard personally. The existing assessment was to be treated as a show cause notice, and coercive action was restrained until reassessment was completed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>