https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422031 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a GST order demanding payment for allegedly availing excess ITC. The petitioner, an iron and steel goods manufacturer, claimed the notices lacked specific allegations, violating natural justice principles. The court ruled the petition lacked merit as the petitioner failed to establish exceptional circumstances warranting writ jurisdiction, noting that statutory remedy through appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act was available. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy instead of invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422031 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a GST order demanding payment for allegedly availing excess ITC. The petitioner, an iron and steel goods manufacturer, claimed the notices lacked specific allegations, violating natural justice principles. The court ruled the petition lacked merit as the petitioner failed to establish exceptional circumstances warranting writ jurisdiction, noting that statutory remedy through appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act was available. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy instead of invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422031