https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422028 The Patna HC held that despite availability of statutory appeal remedy, the court could interfere with an ex-parte order that violated natural justice principles. The petitioner was not afforded sufficient time for hearing, and the order lacked adequate reasons for determining the amount due. The court found the ex-parte order was bad in law due to violation of fair hearing principles and absence of decipherable reasoning from the record. The order carried civil consequences and was passed without proper opportunity for representation. Petition disposed of. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422028 The Patna HC held that despite availability of statutory appeal remedy, the court could interfere with an ex-parte order that violated natural justice principles. The petitioner was not afforded sufficient time for hearing, and the order lacked adequate reasons for determining the amount due. The court found the ex-parte order was bad in law due to violation of fair hearing principles and absence of decipherable reasoning from the record. The order carried civil consequences and was passed without proper opportunity for representation. Petition disposed of. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422028