<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 261 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422001</link>
    <description>The tribunal modified the impugned order by reducing the redemption fine and setting aside the penalty imposed under a specific section of the Customs Act, partially allowing the appeal. The tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of goods but considered the perishable nature of the cargo in determining the appropriate redemption fine, recognizing the minimal profit margin and lack of proven intentional false declarations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 261 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422001</link>
      <description>The tribunal modified the impugned order by reducing the redemption fine and setting aside the penalty imposed under a specific section of the Customs Act, partially allowing the appeal. The tribunal acknowledged the misdeclaration of goods but considered the perishable nature of the cargo in determining the appropriate redemption fine, recognizing the minimal profit margin and lack of proven intentional false declarations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>