https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421990 The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was deemed entitled to Cenvat credit for the Storage and Warehousing Service at the C&F Agent's premises, as the service provided up to the place of removal, where the goods were sold, was considered an admissible input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment cited by the Revenue representative in a different case was deemed inapplicable as it pertained to sales commission, which was distinguishable from the current scenario. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 May 2022 08:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421990 The Member (Judicial) ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was deemed entitled to Cenvat credit for the Storage and Warehousing Service at the C&F Agent's premises, as the service provided up to the place of removal, where the goods were sold, was considered an admissible input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment cited by the Revenue representative in a different case was deemed inapplicable as it pertained to sales commission, which was distinguishable from the current scenario. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421990