https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421981 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a writ petition challenging a notice under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. The court emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to adhere to procedural rules to prevent prejudice to the petitioner. It clarified that not every procedural error invalidates proceedings unless actual prejudice is demonstrated. The court directed the authority to provide a summary of the case against the petitioner promptly and urged expedited completion of proceedings within two months. The judgment prioritized procedural compliance, protection of petitioner rights, and efficient adjudication under the Act. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2022 20:58:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421981 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a writ petition challenging a notice under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. The court emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to adhere to procedural rules to prevent prejudice to the petitioner. It clarified that not every procedural error invalidates proceedings unless actual prejudice is demonstrated. The court directed the authority to provide a summary of the case against the petitioner promptly and urged expedited completion of proceedings within two months. The judgment prioritized procedural compliance, protection of petitioner rights, and efficient adjudication under the Act. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421981