https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302116 A preventive detention order was held unsustainable because the detention grounds referred to "statements of others" that were not on the record and were not supplied to the detenu, which amounted to non-application of mind and breached the requirement to furnish basic material under Article 22(5). Section 5A did not cure the defect because the reference to the petitioner's statement and the alleged statements of others formed one composite ground, not distinct and severable grounds. Ancillary circumstances, including surrender of passport and pending bail proceedings, did not validate the defective detention grounds. en-us Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2022 18:08:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302116 A preventive detention order was held unsustainable because the detention grounds referred to "statements of others" that were not on the record and were not supplied to the detenu, which amounted to non-application of mind and breached the requirement to furnish basic material under Article 22(5). Section 5A did not cure the defect because the reference to the petitioner's statement and the alleged statements of others formed one composite ground, not distinct and severable grounds. Ancillary circumstances, including surrender of passport and pending bail proceedings, did not validate the defective detention grounds. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 31 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302116