https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302115 Detention orders are invalid where all material grounds are not communicated to the detenue, because Article 22(5) requires disclosure sufficient to enable an effective representation. Here, the authorities relied on additional considerations that were not furnished: in one case, the detenue's alleged dangerous and desperate habits, and in the other, alleged involvement in wagon breaking. As these undisclosed matters formed part of the basis of detention, the omission deprived the detenues of a meaningful opportunity to challenge the orders, rendering the detentions liable to be set aside. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2022 17:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302115 Detention orders are invalid where all material grounds are not communicated to the detenue, because Article 22(5) requires disclosure sufficient to enable an effective representation. Here, the authorities relied on additional considerations that were not furnished: in one case, the detenue's alleged dangerous and desperate habits, and in the other, alleged involvement in wagon breaking. As these undisclosed matters formed part of the basis of detention, the omission deprived the detenues of a meaningful opportunity to challenge the orders, rendering the detentions liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302115