<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 504 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the petitioner&#039;s detention was unlawful as they were denied the opportunity to make a representation, breaching Article 22 of the Constitution. Consequently, the detenu was ordered to be released and placed on parole. The appeal was decided in favor of the petitioner. (1987 (1) TMI 504 - SC)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 17:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 504 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the petitioner&#039;s detention was unlawful as they were denied the opportunity to make a representation, breaching Article 22 of the Constitution. Consequently, the detenu was ordered to be released and placed on parole. The appeal was decided in favor of the petitioner. (1987 (1) TMI 504 - SC)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>