https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114 Detention was held invalid where the detenu was denied a meaningful opportunity to make a representation because the relied-upon documents were not supplied in legible form before confirmation of detention. The demand for legible copies had been conceded, but the duplicate set was furnished only after the detention order had already been confirmed. That delay deprived the detenu of an effective constitutional safeguard under Article 22, and immediate release followed. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2022 17:28:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114 Detention was held invalid where the detenu was denied a meaningful opportunity to make a representation because the relied-upon documents were not supplied in legible form before confirmation of detention. The demand for legible copies had been conceded, but the duplicate set was furnished only after the detention order had already been confirmed. That delay deprived the detenu of an effective constitutional safeguard under Article 22, and immediate release followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302114