<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 239 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421979</link>
    <description>An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act was treated as a sufficient reason to decline writ interference, and the writ petition was not entertained. The alleged violation of natural justice was left open for the Appellate Authority, and the Court did not decide the disputed question of service of notice or opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 239 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421979</link>
      <description>An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act was treated as a sufficient reason to decline writ interference, and the writ petition was not entertained. The alleged violation of natural justice was left open for the Appellate Authority, and the Court did not decide the disputed question of service of notice or opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>