<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 229 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421969</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the issues back to the Assessing Officer for verification of the sources of investment and gifts received, emphasizing the need for factual verification and providing the assessee with an opportunity to present evidence. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, ensuring a fair assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 229 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421969</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the issues back to the Assessing Officer for verification of the sources of investment and gifts received, emphasizing the need for factual verification and providing the assessee with an opportunity to present evidence. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, ensuring a fair assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>