<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 227 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of substantiation by the tax authorities and criticized the undue delay in adjudication by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing clear reasons for decisions and adhering to statutory timelines for timely justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 227 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of substantiation by the tax authorities and criticized the undue delay in adjudication by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing clear reasons for decisions and adhering to statutory timelines for timely justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>