<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 225 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 3,13,172/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact default in the show cause notice, violating statutory obligations. This rendered the penalty unsustainable, leading to the penalty proceedings being void ab initio. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was set aside without addressing the merits of the case or the limitation period issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 225 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 3,13,172/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact default in the show cause notice, violating statutory obligations. This rendered the penalty unsustainable, leading to the penalty proceedings being void ab initio. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was set aside without addressing the merits of the case or the limitation period issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>