<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28821</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(b) was invalid as it was based on the Revenue Audit&#039;s opinion, which did not constitute new information. Additionally, the rectification under Section 154 was not permissible as there was no mistake apparent from the record. The court made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28821</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(b) was invalid as it was based on the Revenue Audit&#039;s opinion, which did not constitute new information. Additionally, the rectification under Section 154 was not permissible as there was no mistake apparent from the record. The court made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>